Nature Debates (cont'd)Rosemary Sutton The scientific journal Nature runs web debates on current topics and late last year had one entitled Why are there so few women in science? Titles for the first 3 weeks discussion were published in the last WISENET Journal. 4th week Men - part of the solution not just part of the problem Objectivity, rationality and truth are the best arguments for more women
in science 5th week A scientific code of ethics would improve opportunity for women. We must question why, and for whose benefit and cost, things are as they
are. Role models, society and expectations: a subtle and challenging route 6th week Numbers are not enough: filters, sponsors and supporters E-mail contributionsWill more women in agricultural research change the agenda? European bureaucracy has to wake up to flexibility. British universities should reward teaching and administration excellence. Is the glass ceiling an illusion? Geophysics - 'I really don't think it's what women should do' An historical anecdote about unanticipated consequences Life as a quadruple minority - never give up. Cognitive differences between men and women may be important. 'Failings' of the academic system are a symptom - not a cause. Examine funding equity at NIH and NSF. Entrenched and aggressive attitudes will remain the basis of discrimination
for the next generation of young women. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Why the Pipeline will Always Leak This debate is a 'non-subject'. Husbands of women scientists must be equal partners. Women should consider a career in taxonomy. Men should take an equal share of childcare. UK parliament to pick up women in science debate Discrimination compromises US national Security.
| Issue 53 Contents | |
|